Rules of Inference
Tags: #◇Problem Solving #◇Logic #◇Inference #◇CCDSTRU #◇M8
◇Important Formulas
An argument in propositional logic is a sequence of propositions where all but the last are premises, and the final proposition is the conclusion. An argument is valid if the truth of all premises implies that the conclusion is true.
Standard Rules of Inference
| Rule of Inference | Name |
|---|---|
| | Conjunction |
| | Addition |
| | Simplification |
| | Resolution |
| | Hypothetical Syllogism |
| | Disjunctive Syllogism |
| | Modus Ponens |
| | Modus Tollens |
Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements
Let (the universe of discourse).
| Rule | Description |
|---|---|
| Universal Instantiation | |
| Universal Generalization | for an arbitrary |
| Existential Instantiation | for some element |
| Existential Generalization | for some element |
[!warning] Order of Instantiation
When dealing with multiple quantified statements, if applicable, use Existential Instantiation before Universal Instantiation to avoid inadvertently restricting the universe.
◇Worked Examples
Example 1: Using Propositional Logic
Given:
Goal: Prove Step 5: (Simplification from 1) Step 6: (Modus Tollens on 5 and 2) Step 7: (Hypothetical Syllogism on 3 and 4) Step 8: (Modus Ponens on 6 and 7)
Example 2: Using Quantified Logic
Given:
- (Everyone in this class has taken CCSALGE)
- (Tomy is a student in this class)
Goal: Prove Step 3: (Universal Instantiation on 1, substituting with Tomy) Step 4: (Modus Ponens on 2 and 3)
◇References & Navigation
- Related Notes: ◇Rules of Inference and Induction